Skip to content

CI: delete upstream GitHub actions, do not close pull requests - #34

Closed
illwieckz wants to merge 0 commit into
masterfrom
illwieckz/no-upstream-github-actions
Closed

illwieckz wants to merge 0 commit into
masterfrom
illwieckz/no-upstream-github-actions

Conversation

@illwieckz

@illwieckz illwieckz commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We definitely don't want the close-pull-request action.

The build-test-ci and coverity workflows make heavy usage of gclient, we may not do that. If we want a CI, we will do it ourselves our own way.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for your contribution! Unfortunately, we don't use GitHub pull requests to manage code contributions to this repository. Instead, please see README.md which provides full instructions on how to get involved.

@github-actions github-actions Bot closed this Oct 8, 2026
@illwieckz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Easier to merge after:

@illwieckz illwieckz reopened this Oct 8, 2026
@illwieckz
illwieckz force-pushed the illwieckz/no-upstream-github-actions branch from 148d264 to b4c543e Compare October 8, 2026 00:53
@slipher

slipher commented Oct 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

The Github Actions approach of automatically enabling based on a file is cretinous. They must be hoping that someone with a paid plan clones LLVM or something and accidentally runs the CI.

@illwieckz illwieckz closed this Oct 9, 2026
@illwieckz
illwieckz force-pushed the illwieckz/no-upstream-github-actions branch from b4c543e to 409cdca Compare October 9, 2026 23:53
@illwieckz
illwieckz deleted the illwieckz/no-upstream-github-actions branch October 9, 2026 23:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants