Skip to content

Link state errors to the operation that established the relevant state #298

Description

@CatarinaGamboa

Problem

A state error points to the rejected call, but often leaves the developer searching for the earlier operation that established the receiver's relevant state. In E_A3_07_ScannerOutputStage, preview.setTiling(...) fails at line 59 because preview.setTilingMode(MODE_COPY_FROM_METADATA) at line 53 left its tiling state at startTiling. Intervening compression calls make that connection harder to spot.

Proposed first version

Track the source location of the call or construction that establishes a receiver's state in a particular @StateSet. Carry that origin through operations that preserve that state set. When a state error occurs, include a clickable “State established here” location only when the origin is unambiguous. Record the user-code call site after resolving the resulting state, rather than the location of the @StateRefinement declaration.

Start with straight-line code and a known resulting state. For the scanner example, the link should lead to line 53. If the origin cannot be established reliably, keep the current error without a link.

This needs verifier provenance metadata carried to the error DTO and an extension link to display it. Existing source mappings alone do not provide a reliable transition history. The feature is deterministic and does not require an LLM.

Acceptance criteria

  • Calls affecting another state set do not replace the tiling origin.
  • Two receivers, such as archive and preview, retain separate origins.
  • Constructor-established states can point to construction where applicable.
  • Branches with different possible origins, or transitions whose resulting state cannot be resolved reliably, do not produce a misleading single link.
  • Existing verification results remain unchanged.

Priority and scope

Lower priority, technically difficult enhancement. A conservative first version is preferable to guessing an origin in complex control flow.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or requesterror messagesRelated to error messagesfutureFuture improvement for the languageideTogether with the VS Code extension

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions