Skip to content

fix(ci): pin third-party actions to full commit SHAs - #67

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/sha-pin-actions
Sep 20, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/sha-pin-actions

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

fix(ci): pin third-party actions to full commit SHAs

The account's Actions policy requires a full-length SHA ref. A tag or branch ref is refused at
startup — startup_failure, no jobs, "this workflow graph cannot be shown" — so these workflows
could not run at all. This resolves each ref to the commit it currently points at and records the
ref in a trailing comment, e.g. actions/checkout@<sha> # v4.

dtolnay/rust-toolchain takes its toolchain from the ref itself, so those steps also gained an
explicit with: toolchain: input; without it, a SHA ref would silently lose the channel.

No behaviour is intended to change beyond the pins.

The account's Actions policy requires a full-length SHA ref. A tag or branch ref is refused at
startup — `startup_failure`, no jobs, "this workflow graph cannot be shown" — so these workflows
could not run at all. This resolves each ref to the commit it currently points at and records the
ref in a trailing comment, e.g. `actions/checkout@<sha> # v4`.

`dtolnay/rust-toolchain` takes its toolchain from the ref itself, so those steps also gained an
explicit `with: toolchain:` input; without it, a SHA ref would silently lose the channel.

No behaviour is intended to change beyond the pins.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 19, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 6015155f-35f0-49da-b42e-8c2e0c7947c1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 124ad31 and 4936dca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/rhodibot.yml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (22)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Licence consistency
  • GitHub Check: governance / Language / package anti-pattern policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Well-Known (RFC 9116 + RSR)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Trusted-base reduction policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Workflow security linter
  • GitHub Check: governance / Guix primary / Nix fallback policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Check Workflow Staleness
  • GitHub Check: governance / Security policy checks
  • GitHub Check: governance / Code quality + docs
  • GitHub Check: scan / shell-secrets
  • GitHub Check: scan / rust-secrets
  • GitHub Check: scan / gitleaks
  • GitHub Check: scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis
  • GitHub Check: rust-ci / Detect Cargo.toml
  • GitHub Check: Empty-linter (invisible characters)
  • GitHub Check: Validate K9 contracts
  • GitHub Check: Groove manifest check
  • GitHub Check: Validate A2ML manifests
  • GitHub Check: Validate eclexiaiser manifest
  • GitHub Check: analyze (actions, none)
  • GitHub Check: Hypatia neurosymbolic scan
  • GitHub Check: panic-attack assail
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/rhodibot.yml (1)

37-37: LGTM!


📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Pinned the workflow’s checkout action to a specific version for more consistent automation runs.

Walkthrough

The workflow now pins actions/checkout to commit 3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 instead of the v7.0.1 tag.

Changes

Workflow action pinning

Layer / File(s) Summary
Pin actions/checkout
.github/workflows/rhodibot.yml
The checkout step now references the exact commit SHA for v7.0.1.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Change: Bug fix

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description explains the purpose and intended behaviour, but it does not follow the repository template. It omits the required Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, and Testing sections, and it… Rewrite the description using the repository template. Add the required Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, and Testing sections. Confirm each checklist item, document test results, and align the described changes with the actual diff.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the change: pinning third-party actions to full commit SHAs. It matches the stated objective and the recorded workflow change.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description explains the purpose and intended behaviour, but it does not follow the repository template. It omits the required Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, and Testing sections, and it does not address Screenshots where applicable. It also describes broader changes than the raw summary records.

  • Fix all pre-merge checks with AI

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

A rabbit checks out code with care
A fixed SHA waits there
No mutable tag can hop away
The workflow stays steady each day
Carrots applaud the pin today

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit 80fcba0 into main Sep 20, 2026
28 of 33 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the fix/sha-pin-actions branch September 20, 2026 00:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant