Repository navigation
[TS] Lower object rest with stable sources and excluded keys (#382) - #411
Open
CaelmBleidd wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
CaelmBleidd wants to merge 1 commit into
CaelmBleidd wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Object rest bindings now stabilize the source, reject nullish inputs, and copy remaining own enumerable properties into a fresh container after excluding the named bound keys. RequireObjectCoercible is preserved in the frontend DTO and Kotlin model, and CopyDataProperties reuses the preceding object-spread contract.
Validation on the final combined stack, including regression support and the computed-access correction: typecheck/build;
object-rest.spec.ts,closures.spec.ts,regressions.spec.ts(43 passed within the full suite of 477 tests); relevant Kotlin frontend JSON/model cases passed within the run of 62 tests. No failures or skips.Issue: #382.