docs: rebrand Pythoughts references to PyModel

[elkaix]

The Pythoughts-labs GitHub org is now PyModel. This points repository, issue, and release URLs at PyModel and updates copyright and contact lines. Docs and metadata only; no code paths change.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the 2026 copyright attribution in the MIT license from Pythoughts to PyModel. The license terms are unchanged.
  • Changed the email address for reporting security vulnerabilities to hello@pymodel.com. The instruction to include “[security]” in the subject line remains unchanged.

[coderabbitai]

Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius.

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: PyModel/pythinker-code/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: 3b56348c-ddf0-4a0e-8fa4-4114812f8d8e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 031a7c2 and cadfdd7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• LICENSE
• SECURITY.md

Included review availability: 0 reviews are currently available. Your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 4 reviews per hour.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The 2026 license copyright holder changed from Pythoughts to PyModel. The security vulnerability reporting email changed to hello@pymodel.com. The license terms and security email subject-line instruction remain unchanged.

Changes

Repository metadata

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Attribution and security contact updates LICENSE, SECURITY.md	The 2026 license copyright holder changed to PyModel. The security reporting email changed to hello@pymodel.com; the subject-line instruction remains unchanged.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Other

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to cadfd

The changes update copyright attribution and the vulnerability-reporting address without changing the license terms or documented reporting instruction. No material merge risk is evident.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description accurately summarizes the documentation and metadata changes, but it does not follow the repository template. It omits the required section headings, checklist, and explicit entries fo…	Update the description to include all template sections. Mark bug-only sections as N/A, describe the documentation and metadata changes, state the impact and test coverage, and complete the checklist.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title uses the required docs: prefix, stays within 72 characters, uses imperative wording, and accurately describes the rebrand changes.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description accurately summarizes the documentation and metadata changes, but it does not follow the repository template. It omits the required section headings, checklist, and explicit entries for requirement, bug status, code changes, and impact scope.

• Fix all pre-merge checks with AI

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[pkg-pr-new]

pnpm dlx https://pkg.pr.new/@pymodel/pythinker-code@cadfdd7

npx https://pkg.pr.new/@pymodel/pythinker-code@cadfdd7

commit: cadfdd7